Trend · rank 1 of 250

State capacity & delivery

Rising technical and coordination demands are widening differences between states in their ability to plan, decide and deliver, which determines how well policy is carried out and how each shock is absorbed.

Governance & IntegrityState capacity & governanceinstitutionsresiliencepolitics

Second pass: Carried forward from the first pass unchanged. Held by all three panel models.

Sensitivity and network position

Rank
1of 250
Sensitivity
52.5rank 1
Breadth
7of 20 scenarios High or above
PageRank
100.0rank 1
Eigenvector
93.0
Betweenness
20.4
Links
26trends at Moderate similarity or above
Composite
83.4

Attention over three years

How much this trend is read about on Wikipedia and searched for on Google, week by week, set against the typical trend in the list so that what moves every trend at once is taken out. 100 is this trend's own three-year average. The score measures public attention, which is not the same as the strength of the force: a trend can deepen unnoticed, and a news event can lift attention for a fortnight.

Share of attention
0.29%rank 100 of 250 · a year earlier 0.30%
Now
94
Over a year
−4%Steady
Over three years
−8%
Peak
12815 Oct 2023
Sources
Bothagreement 0.33
Coverage
11languages · 55 nations

Trailing 4-week average. 100 is this trend’s three-year average.

By language

Wikipedia reading in each language edition where the trend’s pages are read enough to measure (11 of 28). Share is of all the readers counted.

LanguageShareNowOver a yearThree years
English57%90−3%
Spanish13%107+7%
German9%101+5%
Russian6%84−15%
Arabic4%110+38%
Indonesian3%84−22%
Thai2%96+41%
Chinese2%78−24%
Ukrainian1%93+22%
Persian1%105+33%
Malay1%75−1%

By country

Google search interest over the three years, as a share of each country’s searching. 100 is the nation where interest is highest. The search terms are English, which favours countries that search in English.

The 12 highest of 55 nations with a reading. All countries (CSV).

By region and G20 member

Attention to this trend inside each place, from Google searches made in its countries and Wikipedia reading in the languages mostly read there, averaged where both exist. Each line compares the trend with its own past in that place; the lines do not compare places.

Regions

PlaceRead fromNow90 days1 year3 yearsThree years
North AmericaGoogle in 2 countries + Wikipedia in English95−1%−5%−10%
EuropeGoogle in 9 countries + Wikipedia in German98−9%+3%−8%
Indo-PacificGoogle in 9 countries + Wikipedia in Chinese, Indonesian, Thai, Malay86−1%−17%−26%
South AsiaGoogle in 3 countries73−9%−23%−40%
Gulf and Middle EastGoogle in 1 country + Wikipedia in Persian, Arabic129+86%−7%+12%
AfricaGoogle in 5 countries69−2%−16%−54%
Latin America and CaribbeanGoogle in 6 countries + Wikipedia in Spanish96+9%−13%+2%
Russia and EurasiaGoogle in 1 country + Wikipedia in Russian, Ukrainian65−27%−25%−45%

G20 members

PlaceRead fromNow90 days1 year3 yearsThree years
ArgentinaGoogle93+13%+7%−26%
AustraliaGoogle97−27%+21%+21%
BrazilGoogle72+10%−34%−35%
CanadaGoogle93−24%−4%+2%
FranceGoogle86−15%−6%−18%
GermanyGoogle + Wikipedia in German91−10%−7%−15%
IndiaGoogle77−19%−3%−36%
IndonesiaGoogle + Wikipedia in Indonesian84+6%−18%−32%
ItalyGoogle79+20%−33%−36%
JapanGoogle104+75%−9%−6%
South KoreaGoogle91+74%−42%−4%
MexicoGoogle92+39%−44%+17%
RussiaWikipedia in Russian85−12%−15%−37%
South AfricaGoogle80−3%−21%−14%
TürkiyeGoogle149+181%−24%+83%
United KingdomGoogle116−6%+69%+30%
United StatesGoogle + Wikipedia in English96+4%−6%−9%

Share of attention by region

GINC Share of Attention: this trend's share of all the public attention the trends in the list draw, worldwide and in each region, week by week (a 4-week average). Each place is read from the Wikipedia languages mostly read there and Google searching in its countries; where a place's language is shared with others, as English is, Google stands alone.

PlaceShare, last 13 weeksRank thereA year earlierRead from
World0.29%100 of 2500.30%Wikipedia reading in all 28 languages, and Google searching worldwide
Asia Pacific0.52%55 of 2500.51%Wikipedia reading in the region's own languages, not English; Google searching in 15 countries, not China
Europe0.11%178 of 2500.15%German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch and Swedish reading; Google searching in 10 countries, the UK among them
Africa0.53%39 of 2500.75%Google searching in 7 countries; Afrikaans and Swahili reading reaches too few trends to count
South America0.39%71 of 2500.47%Spanish and Portuguese reading, Spanish also read in Spain; Google searching in 5 countries
North America0.09%143 of 2490.11%Google searching in the United States, Canada and Mexico; English reading cannot be split by country
Oceania0.04%195 of 2490.04%Google searching in Australia and New Zealand; English reading cannot be split by country
United States0.09%147 of 2490.07%Google searching; English reading cannot be split by country
United Kingdom0.02%204 of 2490.03%Google searching; English reading cannot be split by country
India0.22%76 of 2490.12%Google searching; Hindi, Bengali and Tamil reading reaches too few trends to count, and English cannot be split by country
China···Wikipedia and Google are blocked in China; no open source counts reading there
Russia0.32%90 of 2030.30%Russian reading, which is also done across the former Soviet states; Google's figures for Russia cannot be bought
Japan0.11%173 of 2500.11%Japanese reading and Google searching
Germany0.18%135 of 2500.22%German reading and Google searching
France0.02%239 of 2500.03%French reading, also done in Africa and Canada, and Google searching
Italy0.10%161 of 2500.13%Italian reading and Google searching
South Korea0.12%153 of 2500.10%Korean reading and Google searching
Indonesia0.57%34 of 2500.45%Google searching; Indonesian reading reaches too few trends to count
Brazil0.11%145 of 2500.12%Portuguese reading and Google searching
Türkiye0.03%33 of 2500.03%Google searching; Turkish reading reaches too few trends to count

Relation to each scenario

A trend relates to a scenario when it changes how likely the scenario is, how hard it lands, or is itself sharply changed by it. Each score is the median of three scores given separately by the members of the model panel.

RelationScenarioFamily
5 · Very highA disputed transfer of power breaks effective government S05Geopolitical and security
4 · HighA global funding seizure reaches sovereign balance sheets S02Economic and trade
4 · HighHybrid coercion ends in an infrastructure blackout S04Geopolitical and security
4 · HighA major disaster disables the national economic core S07Energy, climate and resources
4 · HighA novel respiratory pathogen exceeds health surge capacity S10Health
4 · HighA verified Middle East settlement restores access S14 ↗Geopolitical and security
4 · HighA public service platform reaches inclusive operation S18 ↗Technology and infrastructure
3 · ModerateA regional war closes a globally important sea route S03Geopolitical and security
3 · ModerateTwo breadbasket failures trigger a food availability crisis S06Energy, climate and resources
3 · ModerateA cryptographic breakthrough invalidates digital trust S09Technology and infrastructure
3 · ModerateA creditor agreement releases fiscal capacity S11 ↗Economic and trade
3 · ModerateA cross-regional market access compact redirects investment S12 ↗Economic and trade
3 · ModerateA validated farming package raises water-efficient output S16 ↗Energy, climate and resources
3 · ModerateAffordable preventive treatments reduce chronic illness S19 ↗Health
3 · ModerateA live outbreak proves rapid distributed pandemic defence S20 ↗Health
2 · LowCritical trade divides into rival blocs S01Economic and trade
2 · LowAn AI deployment step causes abrupt labour displacement S08Technology and infrastructure
2 · LowA great-power agreement lowers economic security barriers S13 ↗Geopolitical and security
2 · LowCheap firm clean power becomes available at scale S15 ↗Energy, climate and resources
2 · LowAI-directed research produces a reproducible discovery step S17 ↗Technology and infrastructure

Similarity = 0.3 × shared tags (Jaccard) + 0.3 × likeness of scenario profiles (cosine) + 0.3 × likeness of names and descriptions (TF-IDF cosine) + 0.1 if in the same capability domain, cut into seven levels at 0.12, 0.22, 0.33, 0.45, 0.58, 0.72. Shown at Moderate and above.

SimilarityTrendThemeRank
4 · HighCivil service capability & payState capacity & governance2
4 · HighRule of law & judicial independenceState capacity & governance3
4 · HighExecutive overreach & emergency powersState capacity & governance4
4 · HighCorruption & state captureState capacity & governance5
4 · HighPublic procurement capabilityState capacity & governance6
4 · HighRegulatory capture & lobbying powerState capacity & governance8
4 · HighLocal & city government capacityState capacity & governance11
4 · HighSocial protection coverage gapsState capacity & governance13
4 · HighErosion of rights & civic freedomsState capacity & governance14
4 · HighPolarisation & populismState capacity & governance15
4 · HighFiscal rules & budget credibilityState capacity & governance17
4 · HighCivil unrest & protest mobilisationState capacity & governance25
4 · HighOutsourcing & public-private deliveryState capacity & governance27
4 · HighCitizen participation & deliberative democracyState capacity & governance60
3 · ModerateDeclining institutional trustInformation & trust7
3 · ModeratePublic communication in crisisInformation & trust10
3 · ModerateSovereign debt & interest burdenMoney & debt12
3 · ModerateDiplomatic capacity under strainDiplomacy & influence16
3 · ModerateIllicit finance & beneficial ownershipState capacity & governance20
3 · ModerateOfficial statistics & data capacityState capacity & governance21
3 · ModerateDecline of independent journalismInformation & trust29
3 · ModerateDigital public infrastructureState capacity & governance31
3 · ModerateAdaptive regulationState capacity & governance33
3 · ModerateData protection & digital rightsState capacity & governance44
3 · ModerateCentral bank independence under pressureState capacity & governance64
3 · ModerateAsylum & migration system strainState capacity & governance115