Trend · rank 9 of 250

Entrenched opportunity inequality

Unequal access to wealth, education and networks is reproducing capability gaps across generations, limiting national talent development and social mobility even where average incomes and qualifications rise.

Human CapitalPeople, health & workinequalitywork skills

Second pass: Carried forward from the first pass, where it was Inequality. Held by all three panel models.

Sensitivity and network position

Rank
9of 250
Sensitivity
21.7rank 21
Breadth
0of 20 scenarios High or above
PageRank
61.3rank 20
Eigenvector
8.8
Betweenness
100.0
Links
18trends at Moderate similarity or above
Composite
55.8

Attention over three years

How much this trend is read about on Wikipedia and searched for on Google, week by week, set against the typical trend in the list so that what moves every trend at once is taken out. 100 is this trend's own three-year average. The score measures public attention, which is not the same as the strength of the force: a trend can deepen unnoticed, and a news event can lift attention for a fortnight.

Share of attention
0.17%rank 144 of 250 · a year earlier 0.18%
Now
92
Over a year
+16%Rising
Over three years
−14%
Peak
15223 Aug 2026
Sources
Bothagreement 0.44
Coverage
21languages · 56 nations

Trailing 4-week average. 100 is this trend’s three-year average.

By language

Wikipedia reading in each language edition where the trend’s pages are read enough to measure (21 of 28). Share is of all the readers counted.

LanguageShareNowOver a yearThree years
English53%81−16%
Spanish8%64−14%
Russian7%113+44%
German5%78+2%
Chinese4%71−7%
Italian3%79−9%
Hindi3%57−7%
French3%89−1%
Korean2%70−15%
Japanese2%97+7%
Portuguese2%109+27%
Indonesian1%116+64%
Arabic1%74+21%
Persian1%69−2%
Polish1%73−5%
Turkish1%110+87%
Ukrainian1%81+8%
Hebrew1%90+35%
Vietnamese1%70+19%
Dutch0%83+16%
Swedish0%68−19%

By country

Google search interest over the three years, as a share of each country’s searching. 100 is the nation where interest is highest. The search terms are English, which favours countries that search in English.

The 12 highest of 56 nations with a reading. All countries (CSV).

By region and G20 member

Attention to this trend inside each place, from Google searches made in its countries and Wikipedia reading in the languages mostly read there, averaged where both exist. Each line compares the trend with its own past in that place; the lines do not compare places.

Regions

PlaceRead fromNow90 days1 year3 yearsThree years
North AmericaGoogle in 2 countries + Wikipedia in English94+8%+8%−15%
EuropeGoogle in 6 countries + Wikipedia in German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish72−19%−12%−42%
Indo-PacificGoogle in 8 countries + Wikipedia in Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Indonesian87+6%−3%−39%
South AsiaGoogle in 1 country + Wikipedia in Hindi66−32%−8%−51%
Gulf and Middle EastGoogle in 1 country + Wikipedia in Persian, Arabic, Turkish, Hebrew149+52%+305%−8%
AfricaGoogle in 1 country900%−34%+106%
Latin America and CaribbeanGoogle in 6 countries + Wikipedia in Spanish, Portuguese73−22%−20%−43%
Russia and EurasiaWikipedia in Russian, Ukrainian106+12%+37%−26%

G20 members

PlaceRead fromNow90 days1 year3 yearsThree years
ArgentinaGoogle50−64%−47%−70%
AustraliaGoogle101+1%−12%+16%
BrazilGoogle + Wikipedia in Portuguese92−8%−8%−16%
CanadaGoogle68−37%−14%−28%
FranceGoogle + Wikipedia in French68−31%−10%−36%
GermanyGoogle + Wikipedia in German75−14%−19%−37%
IndiaGoogle + Wikipedia in Hindi66−32%−8%−51%
IndonesiaGoogle + Wikipedia in Indonesian92+57%−4%−45%
ItalyGoogle + Wikipedia in Italian72−17%−19%−42%
JapanGoogle + Wikipedia in Japanese96+4%0%−15%
South KoreaGoogle + Wikipedia in Korean92−4%−14%−32%
MexicoGoogle60−25%−27%−60%
RussiaWikipedia in Russian113+10%+44%−10%
South AfricaGoogle900%−34%+106%
TürkiyeGoogle + Wikipedia in Turkish162+68%+374%−12%
United KingdomGoogle65−19%−29%−47%
United StatesGoogle + Wikipedia in English101+19%+16%−12%

Share of attention by region

GINC Share of Attention: this trend's share of all the public attention the trends in the list draw, worldwide and in each region, week by week (a 4-week average). Each place is read from the Wikipedia languages mostly read there and Google searching in its countries; where a place's language is shared with others, as English is, Google stands alone.

PlaceShare, last 13 weeksRank thereA year earlierRead from
World0.17%144 of 2500.18%Wikipedia reading in all 28 languages, and Google searching worldwide
Asia Pacific0.17%143 of 2500.18%Wikipedia reading in the region's own languages, not English; Google searching in 15 countries, not China
Europe0.09%198 of 2500.12%German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch and Swedish reading; Google searching in 10 countries, the UK among them
Africa0.06%161 of 2500.10%Google searching in 7 countries; Afrikaans and Swahili reading reaches too few trends to count
South America0.16%146 of 2500.19%Spanish and Portuguese reading, Spanish also read in Spain; Google searching in 5 countries
North America0.11%137 of 2490.13%Google searching in the United States, Canada and Mexico; English reading cannot be split by country
Oceania0.11%134 of 2490.13%Google searching in Australia and New Zealand; English reading cannot be split by country
United States0.13%116 of 2490.15%Google searching; English reading cannot be split by country
United Kingdom0.09%133 of 2490.12%Google searching; English reading cannot be split by country
India0.06%145 of 2490.04%Google searching; Hindi, Bengali and Tamil reading reaches too few trends to count, and English cannot be split by country
China···Wikipedia and Google are blocked in China; no open source counts reading there
Russia0.28%106 of 2030.21%Russian reading, which is also done across the former Soviet states; Google's figures for Russia cannot be bought
Japan0.08%197 of 2500.06%Japanese reading and Google searching
Germany0.10%196 of 2500.13%German reading and Google searching
France0.08%187 of 2500.08%French reading, also done in Africa and Canada, and Google searching
Italy0.13%139 of 2500.18%Italian reading and Google searching
South Korea0.13%145 of 2500.15%Korean reading and Google searching
Indonesia0.15%97 of 2500.23%Google searching; Indonesian reading reaches too few trends to count
Brazil0.23%108 of 2500.22%Portuguese reading and Google searching
Türkiye0.00%107 of 2500.00%Google searching; Turkish reading reaches too few trends to count

Relation to each scenario

A trend relates to a scenario when it changes how likely the scenario is, how hard it lands, or is itself sharply changed by it. Each score is the median of three scores given separately by the members of the model panel.

RelationScenarioFamily
3 · ModerateAn AI deployment step causes abrupt labour displacement S08Technology and infrastructure
3 · ModerateA validated farming package raises water-efficient output S16 ↗Energy, climate and resources
3 · ModerateA public service platform reaches inclusive operation S18 ↗Technology and infrastructure
3 · ModerateAffordable preventive treatments reduce chronic illness S19 ↗Health
2 · LowA disputed transfer of power breaks effective government S05Geopolitical and security
2 · LowTwo breadbasket failures trigger a food availability crisis S06Energy, climate and resources
2 · LowA novel respiratory pathogen exceeds health surge capacity S10Health
2 · LowAI-directed research produces a reproducible discovery step S17 ↗Technology and infrastructure
2 · LowA live outbreak proves rapid distributed pandemic defence S20 ↗Health
1 · Very lowA global funding seizure reaches sovereign balance sheets S02Economic and trade
1 · Very lowA major disaster disables the national economic core S07Energy, climate and resources
1 · Very lowA creditor agreement releases fiscal capacity S11 ↗Economic and trade
1 · Very lowA cross-regional market access compact redirects investment S12 ↗Economic and trade
0 · Not relatedCritical trade divides into rival blocs S01Economic and trade
0 · Not relatedA regional war closes a globally important sea route S03Geopolitical and security
0 · Not relatedHybrid coercion ends in an infrastructure blackout S04Geopolitical and security
0 · Not relatedA cryptographic breakthrough invalidates digital trust S09Technology and infrastructure
0 · Not relatedA great-power agreement lowers economic security barriers S13 ↗Geopolitical and security
0 · Not relatedA verified Middle East settlement restores access S14 ↗Geopolitical and security
0 · Not relatedCheap firm clean power becomes available at scale S15 ↗Energy, climate and resources

Similarity = 0.3 × shared tags (Jaccard) + 0.3 × likeness of scenario profiles (cosine) + 0.3 × likeness of names and descriptions (TF-IDF cosine) + 0.1 if in the same capability domain, cut into seven levels at 0.12, 0.22, 0.33, 0.45, 0.58, 0.72. Shown at Moderate and above.

SimilarityTrendThemeRank
5 · Very highFoundational learning deficitsPeople, health & work162
5 · Very highGender participation divergencePeople, health & work192
4 · HighAI & knowledge-work automationPeople, health & work53
4 · HighInformal employment persistencePeople, health & work84
4 · HighCare labour demand growthPeople, health & work86
4 · HighYouth population expansionPeople, health & work146
4 · HighGraduate skill mismatchPeople, health & work178
3 · ModerateCivil service capability & payState capacity & governance2
3 · ModerateSocial protection coverage gapsState capacity & governance13
3 · ModerateTechnical & occupational skill shortagesPeople, health & work19
3 · ModerateTechnology diffusion & productivity gapsPeople, health & work24
3 · ModerateHealth workforce scarcityPeople, health & work48
3 · ModeratePersistent nutritional deprivationFood, water & nature71
3 · ModeratePopulation ageingPeople, health & work96
3 · ModerateReproductive, maternal & child healthPeople, health & work123
3 · ModerateMental health demand growthPeople, health & work127
3 · ModerateLifelong learning & digital reskillingPeople, health & work132
3 · ModerateYouth employment exclusionPeople, health & work177